Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The present research complements extant variable-centered research that focused on the dimensions of autonomous and controlled motivation through adoption of a person-centered approach for identifying motivational profiles. Both in high school students (Study 1) and college students (Study 2), a cluster analysis revealed 4 motivational profiles: a good quality motivation group (i.e., high autonomous, low controlled); a poor quality motivation group (i.e., low autonomous, high controlled); a low quantity motivation group (i.e., low autonomous, low controlled); and a high quantity motivation group (i.e., high autonomous, high controlled). To compare the 4 groups, the authors derived predictions from qualitative and quantitative perspectives on motivation. Findings generally favored the qualitative perspective; compared with the other groups, the good quality motivation group displayed the most optimal learning pattern and scored highest on perceived need-supportive teaching. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Eline Sierens
Bart Soenens
Journal of Educational Psychology
KU Leuven
Ghent University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vansteenkiste et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a094dc6b0d552aa8b459a30 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015083