Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
T he application of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to high-surgical-risk and inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is gaining widespread acceptance with a burgeoning supportive evidence base. he incidence of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) subsequent to TAVI exceeds that after any other cardiac intervention or valve surgery, most notably in the acute periprocedural period, diminishing over the subsequent 2 months. 5 This elevated early risk reflects the increased incidence of ischemic stroke thought secondary to particulate emboli dislodged by the procedure itself or as a result of thromboembolism. n fact, cerebral embolism is a universal finding associated with these procedures. 7 Most events, however, are subclinical or silent, with clinically apparent CVEs representing but the tip-of-the-iceberg. As a result of the difficulty ascertaining these subclinical events, the true association between TAVI and neurological injury is unknown and the harm potentially underestimated.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonathon P. Fanning
D. Walters
D. Platts
Circulation
The University of Queensland
Lung Institute
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fanning et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff54e26018b8d0892d782d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.004103
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: