A novel real-time algorithm for quantifying blood pressure waveforms yielded an error rate of 0.09%, proving superior to three commercially available heartbeat detectors.
Does the proposed real-time algorithm improve heartbeat detection accuracy compared to commercially available detectors in blood pressure waveforms?
The proposed real-time algorithm for quantifying blood pressure waveforms achieves a very low error rate of 0.09%, outperforming three commercial heartbeat detectors.
A real-time algorithm for quantification of biological oscillatory signals, such as arterial blood pressure (BP) is proposed which does not require user intervention and works on waveforms complicated by rapid changes in the mean level, frequency, or by the presence of arrhythmia. The algorithm is based on the continous independent assessment of the refractory period (RP). In the first stage, a sample of the signal is band-pass filtered. During the next stage: 1) the local maxima in the filtered signal are identified and their pulse amplitudes (PA) measured on the side opposite to the possible notch position and 2) those maxima whose PA exceeds some threshold are selected and an array of RP values is formed as a fraction of the moving estimate of the interval between successive selected peaks. Finally, the original signal is analyzed by means of two moving averages (MAs) with short and long averaging time intervals. The true peaks are determined as the maxima between intersections of MAs if the peak-to-peak or the intersection-to-intersection intervals since the previous peak and the previous intersection exceed the RP. The algorithm proved to be superior against three commercially available heartbeat detectors yielding an error rate of 0.09%.
Navakatikyan et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Arterial blood pressure waveforms. Real-time algorithm based on continuous independent assessment of the refractory period vs. Three commercially available heartbeat detectors was evaluated on Error rate. A novel real-time algorithm for quantifying blood pressure waveforms yielded an error rate of 0.09%, proving superior to three commercially available heartbeat detectors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: