Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
For the last ten years environmentalists and the trade policy community have engaged in a heated debate over the environmental consequences of liberalized trade. The debate was originally fueled by negotiations over the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uruguay round of GATT negotiations, both of which occurred at a time when concerns over global warming, species extinction and industrial pollution were rising. Recently it has been intensified by the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and proposals for future rounds of trade negotiations. The debate has often been unproductive. It has been hampered by the lack of a common language and also suffered from little recourse to economic theory and empirical evidence. The purpose of this essay is set out what we currently know about the environmental consequences of economic growth and international trade. We critically review both theory and empirical work to answer three basic questions. What do we know about the relationship between international trade, economic growth and the environment? How can this evidence help us evaluate ongoing policy debates? Where do we go from here?
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brian R. Copeland
University of British Columbia
M. Scott Taylor
National Bureau of Economic Research
Journal of Economic Literature
University of Wisconsin–Madison
University of British Columbia
University of Calgary
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Copeland et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8fa845c3030ff03d1ab34 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/.42.1.7