Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to establish the predictive validity of a diagnosis of schizophrenia in childhood and early adolescence by examining diagnostic continuity into adult life and comparing social and symptomatic outcomes of child- and adolescent-onset schizophrenia with those of nonschizophrenic psychoses. METHOD: A total of 110 consecutive patients with first-episode child- or adolescent-onset psychosis (mean age at onset=14.2 years) presenting to the Maudsley Hospital in London between 1973 and 1991 were followed up an average of 11.5 years after first contact. Ninety-three (84.5%) of 110 patients were successfully followed-up, 51 with a first-episode diagnosis of DSM-III-R schizophrenia and 42 with nonschizophrenic psychoses. Consensus best-estimate DSM-III-R diagnoses were made at follow-up, and course and outcome were assessed blind to first-episode diagnosis. RESULTS: Diagnostic stability was high for child- and adolescent-onset DSM-III-R schizophrenia (positive predictive value=80%) and affective psychoses (positive predictive value=83%) but much lower for schizoaffective and atypical psychoses. Compared with other psychoses, child- or adolescent-onset schizophrenia was associated with significantly worse symptomatic and social outcomes, which were characterized by a chronic illness course and severe impairments in social relationships and independent living. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of DSM-III-R schizophrenia in childhood and adolescence has good predictive validity. The high level of diagnostic stability suggests etiological continuity with adult schizophrenia, with onset in childhood and adolescence associated with a particularly malignant course and outcome.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chris Hollis
University of Nottingham
American Journal of Psychiatry
University of Nottingham
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chris Hollis (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc983b33628da419cdc10 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1652