Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Some recent articles have discussed biased methods for estimating risk ratios from adjusted odds ratios when the outcome is common, and the problem of setting confidence limits for risk ratios. These articles have overlooked the extensive literature on valid estimation of risks, risk ratios, and risk differences from logistic and other models, including methods that remain valid when the outcome is common, and methods for risk and rate estimation from case-control studies. The present article describes how most of these methods can be subsumed under a general formulation that also encompasses traditional standardization methods and methods for projecting the impact of partially successful interventions. Approximate variance formulas for the resulting estimates allow interval estimation; these intervals can be closely approximated by rapid simulation procedures that require only standard software functions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sander Greenland
Boston University
American Journal of Epidemiology
University of California, Los Angeles
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sander Greenland (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e631d10487c0586213c722 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh221
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: