United States population
Estimated prevalence and cost of care for heart failure
The prevalence and economic burden of heart failure in the US are projected to increase significantly due to an aging population, highlighting the need for preventive strategies.
Background—: Heart failure (HF) is an important contributor to both the burden and cost of national healthcare expenditures, with more older Americans hospitalized for HF than for any other medical condition. With the aging of the population, the impact of HF is expected to increase substantially. Methods and Results—: We estimated future costs of HF by adapting a methodology developed by the American Heart Association to project the epidemiology and future costs of HF from 2012 to 2030 without double counting the costs attributed to comorbid conditions. The model assumes that HF prevalence will remain constant by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and that rising costs and technological innovation will continue at the same rate. By 2030, >8 million people in the United States (1 in every 33) will have HF. Between 2012 and 2030, real (2010) total direct medical costs of HF are projected to increase from 21 billion to 53 billion. Total costs, including indirect costs for HF, are estimated to increase from 31 billion in 2012 to 70 billion in 2030. If one assumes all costs of cardiac care for HF patients are attributable to HF (no cost attribution to comorbid conditions), the 2030 projected cost estimates of treating patients with HF will be 3-fold higher (160 billion in direct costs). Conclusions—: The estimated prevalence and cost of care for HF will increase markedly because of aging of the population. Strategies to prevent HF and improve the efficiency of care are needed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul A. Heidenreich
Nancy M. Albert
Larry A. Allen
Circulation Heart Failure
American Heart Association
Institute of Cardiology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Heidenreich et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699f5b655f6a6fb675a9c23f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hhf.0b013e318291329a