Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
MOTIVATION: Many bioinformatics data resources not only hold data in the form of sequences, but also as annotation. In the majority of cases, annotation is written as scientific natural language: this is suitable for humans, but not particularly useful for machine processing. Ontologies offer a mechanism by which knowledge can be represented in a form capable of such processing. In this paper we investigate the use of ontological annotation to measure the similarities in knowledge content or 'semantic similarity' between entries in a data resource. These allow a bioinformatician to perform a similarity measure over annotation in an analogous manner to those performed over sequences. A measure of semantic similarity for the knowledge component of bioinformatics resources should afford a biologist a new tool in their repertoire of analyses. RESULTS: We present the results from experiments that investigate the validity of using semantic similarity by comparison with sequence similarity. We show a simple extension that enables a semantic search of the knowledge held within sequence databases. AVAILABILITY: Software available from http://www.russet.org.uk.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Phillip Lord
Newcastle University
Robert Stevens
Johns Hopkins University
Andy Brass
University of Manchester
Bioinformatics
University of Manchester
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lord et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cb650d48675e49423ab3a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg153
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: