Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The world is naturally radioactive and approximately 82% of human-absorbed radiation doses, which are out of control, arise from natural sources such as cosmic, terrestrial, and exposure from inhalation or intake radiation sources. In recent years, several international studies have been carried out, which have reported different values regarding the effect of background radiation on human health. Gamma radiation emitted from natural sources (background radiation) is largely due to primordial radionuclides, mainly (232)Th and (238)U series, and their decay products, as well as (40)K, which exist at trace levels in the earth's crust. Their concentrations in soil, sands, and rocks depend on the local geology of each region in the world. Naturally occurring radioactive materials generally contain terrestrial-origin radionuclides, left over since the creation of the earth. In addition, the existence of some springs and quarries increases the dose rate of background radiation in some regions that are known as high level background radiation regions. The type of building materials used in houses can also affect the dose rate of background radiations. The present review article was carried out to consider all of the natural radiations, including cosmic, terrestrial, and food radiation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daryoush Shahbazi‐Gahrouei
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Mehrdad Gholami
Lorestan University of Medical Sciences
Samaneh Sadat Setayandeh
UNSW Sydney
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Advanced Biomedical Research
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
University of Isfahan
Lorestan University of Medical Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shahbazi‐Gahrouei et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7198cb51524f0e4563795 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.115821
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: