Differential effects of the site of permanent epicardial pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in the young: implications for lead placement

AIMS: To analyse left ventricular (LV) synchrony and function with respect to the epicardial pacing site in the young. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular function and synchrony (M-mode, speckle tracking) were evaluated during mid-term follow-up in 32 children with complete non-surgical (n = 15) or surgical (n = 17) atrioventricular block (structural heart disease in 21/32) paced from LV apex (n = 19), right ventricular (RV) apex (n = 7), and RV free wall (n = 6), respectively. Data are in the following order: LV apical, RV apical, and RV free wall pacing. Septal to posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD) = median 0, 69, and 136 ms (P < 0.001), septal to lateral mechanical delay = 54 +/- 29, 73 +/- 24, and 129 +/- 70 ms (P = 0.001), apical to basal mechanical delay = 96 +/- 37, 106 +/- 50, and 79 +/- 18 ms (P NS), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) = 57 +/- 9, 49 +/- 12, and 33 +/- 10% (P < 0.001), respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction correlated negatively with SPWMD (R(2) = 0.454, P < 0.001) and septal to lateral mechanical delay (R(2) = 0.320, P < 0.001) but not with apical to basal mechanical delay. Right ventricular free wall pacing (P = 0.014) and SPWMD (P = 0.044) were negative multivariable predictors of LVEF. CONCLUSION: Compared with other sites, LV apical pacing preserves septal to lateral LV synchrony and systolic function and may be the preferred epicardial pacing site in the young.