Does tailored Automatic Capture Management (ACM) programming based on atrial threshold variability ensure effective atrial stimulation in pacemaker patients?
Patients with pacemakers utilizing Automatic Capture Management (ACM), including those with normal AV conduction, AV block (AVB), and recurrent atrial fibrillation
Automatic Capture Management (ACM) programming with tailored daily atrial threshold measurements (2 vs 3-4) and adapted stimulation output (+1 V in first trimester, +0.5 V thereafter)
Effective atrial stimulation (> 99.5%) and reliability of ACMsurrogate
Tailoring Automatic Capture Management programming based on patient conduction characteristics and time from implantation ensures highly effective atrial stimulation.
The reliability of ACM is high over a long follow-up. On the basis of atrial threshold variability, a practical approach to ACM programming should be two daily atrial threshold measurements in patients with normal AV conduction and%Ap 40% or with recurrent atrial fibrillation and AVB. The lowest adapted stimulation output should achieve at least threshold +1 V in the first trimester after implantation, then threshold +0.5 V thereafter, in order to achieve > 99.5% effective atrial stimulation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mauro Biffi
Electrophysiology
G Spitali
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna
Massimo Stefano Silvetti
Pediatric Cardiology
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
University of Bologna
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Biffi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d576b662196bac97d9bc38 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00890.x