Does aortic valve replacement have different effects on left ventricular mass regression in patients with aortic regurgitation compared to aortic stenosis?
Aortic valve replacement leads to significant left ventricular mass regression, with a greater absolute decline observed in patients with aortic regurgitation compared to aortic stenosis.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) has different effects on the left ventricular mass (LVM) in patients with different types of aortic valve disease, i.e. aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), or combined disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 100 patients with AS; (n=57), AR; (n=22), and combined disease; (n=21). Each patient was evaluated before and up to 8.7 years (mean follow-up period 1.42 +/- 1.65 years) after operation by transthoracic echocardiography. LVM was calculated based on echocardiographic parameters. Following AVR, the LVM for the entire group decreased from 373 +/- 145 g to 280 +/- 102 g (P=0.0001). The AS subgroup lost 13.7 +/- 30.7% from the preoperative LVM, compared to 28.8 +/- 24.8% in the AR subgroup (P<0.05) and 23.1 +/- 33.1% in the combined subgroup. The preoperative LVM was higher among patients with AR vs. AS patients (501 +/- 173 g vs. 319 +/- 100 g respectively, P<0.05). The decrease in LVM was significantly higher in patients with preoperative AR compared to AS patients (165 +/- 150 g vs. 58 +/- 96 g, respectively, P<0.05). However, the postoperative LVM remained higher among the former. The only preoperative parameter (of the LVM formula) that was different between AR and AS patients was the left ventricular end diastolic diameter (68 +/- 11 mm vs. 51 +/- 7 mm, respectively, P<0.05). No significant differences were found in wall thickness among the groups studied. Univariate analysis showed that gender (male), type of aortic valve disease (AR vs. AS), and larger prosthetic valve diameter correlated significantly with greater decrease in postoperative LVM. In multivariate analysis comparing the above variables between AS and AR subgroups, only the patient's gender (i.e. male) was identified as an independent predictor of LVM regression. CONCLUSION: Patients with AR have a greater decline in LVM compared with patients with AS following AVR. The postoperative decline in LVM is higher among males and those with larger prosthetic valve diameter.
Mordehay Vaturi (Thu,) studied this question.