CrossTalk proposal: Bradycardia in the trained athlete is attributable to high vagal tone

Endurance trained athletes are well known to have low resting heart rates, with values below 30 beats min−1 reported. Such low resting heart rates result from long periods of endurance training (Carter et al. 2003). We argue here that an increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity (vagal tone) is a major contributor. The factors contributing to heart rhythm are complex but essentially there are three, the cardiac parasympathetic (vagal) nerves, the sympathetic nerves and the pacemaker cells, that set the intrinsic rate. At rest in healthy individuals the heart rate is determined by the balance between a high parasympathetic and low sympathetic activity changing around a fixed intrinsic pacemaker cell rhythm of around 105 beats min−1 or lower depending on age (Jose Danson D'Souza et al. 2014). Studies to determine the underlying mechanisms causing the lowering of heart rate following endurance training have provided different explanations. This is partly due to interpretation of non-uniform methodology and partly to the difficulty of obtaining direct measurements of autonomic neural activity in humans. However, we consider there are clear indications that training bradycardia is largely caused by an augmentation of parasympathetic influence on the pacemaker cells. We are persuaded because it appears that neural pathways are necessary for post training resting bradycardia. For example, Ordway et al. (1982) showed that dogs with the cardiac autonomic nerves removed had no decrease in resting heart rate after endurance training compared to a control group, although other measures of the mild exercise training were similar in both groups. Furthermore, removal of baroreceptor influence by sinoaortic denervation in rats prevents an endurance training-induced increase in baroreflex–heart rate sensitivity and decrease in resting heart rate (Ceroni et al. 2009). To appreciate the evidence it is essential to understand the organization of cardiac parasympathetic control. Cardiac parasympathetic nerves in dogs and cats have a low frequency (5 Hz) burst pattern of basal activity (Koizumi et al. 1985) oscillating in phase with each cardiac beat and with a superimposed respiratory rhythm. Closer analysis of the cardiac preganglionic neurones in the brainstem by McAllen Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996). PSA of heart rhythm reduces an R–R interval time series to its constituent sine wave frequency components. The spectral density of the signal describes the magnitude of the signal causing the variance at a particular frequency. It is the variation in the length of the inter-spike interval not the absolute length that is measured. In the spectrum the high frequency (HF) peak occurring at the individual's respiratory rate is abolished by atropine (Hollander Maciel et al. 1985) and by section of the vagus nerve in experimental animals (Ordway et al. 1982). A higher cardiac parasympathetic activity results in a more dominant respiratory rhythm so the HF peak is a robust surrogate for vagal tone (Fouad et al. 1984). However, it is only of significant quantitative value when changes in HF power are compared within a single individual and respiratory frequency and depth is controlled (Task Force, 1996). With these caveats in mind a spectral analysis was done in a longitudinal study on a group of untrained young individuals who then underwent an aerobic endurance-training programme for 6 weeks. There was a marked and significant increase in HF power (Al-Ani et al. 1996) together with a significant decrease in resting heart rate. An enhanced vagal influence was further supported by measuring the immediate decrease in R–R interval in response to muscle contraction during a selected point in expiration and in inspiration. The immediate increase in heart rate caused by small muscle afferent fibres excited by muscle contraction occurs within the central nervous system. Therefore, their action reflects the excitability of neurones participating in the heart rate control circuits. Al-Ani et al. (1996) showed that the muscle-initiated decrease in R–R interval was significantly greater than the pre-training value. This is consistent with an increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity. The interpretation is supported by other studies showing that contraction-induced or exercise-induced immediate increase in heart rate is blocked by atropine (e.g. Maciel et al. 1985). The results accord with other longitudinal studies (Hottenrott et al. 2006). Thus these data strongly suggest an augmented contribution of cardiac parasympathetic nerve activity to training bradycardia. Consistent with this Herrlich et al. (1960) showed that a training-induced decrease in resting heart rate in rats was associated with a considerable increase in atrial acetylcholine content. In accordance with this Paterson and his colleagues (Mohan et al. 2000; Danson Herring Chowdhary et al. 2002; Markos et al. 2002). Thus these studies clearly show that exercise-induced resting bradycardia is at least in part dependent on changes in parasympathetic activity. A similar conclusion is reached by studies testing the efficacy or sensitivity of the baroreceptor–heart rate reflex. Activity in single fibres of the cardiac vagus nerve is increased by arterial baroreceptor stimulation (Kunze, 1972) and baroreflex sensitivity is increased in aerobic exercise-trained individuals (e.g. Lenard et al. 2005). Furthermore, removal of baroreceptor influence by sinoaortic denervation in rats prevents a training-induced increase in baroreflex–heart rate sensitivity (Ceroni et al. 2009). Using radiotracers to measure cardiac noradrenaline spillover from the coronary sinus in humans before and after endurance training, Meredith et al. (1991) found no significant change. However, skeletal muscle and kidney sympathetic activity is reduced following endurance training (Meredith et al. 1991; Grassi et al. 1994). The foregoing evidence strongly suggests that resting bradycardia following endurance training is attributable to high cardiac vagal tone. However, we are aware that a study on rats by Bolter et al. (1973) showed that exercise training reduced the intrinsic heart rate in isolated atria. Boyett and colleagues (D'Souza et al. 2014) showed that this effect was due to down-regulation of the funny current If. Nonetheless, exercise training in rats also increases atrial acetylcholine, and vagal presynaptic NO–cGMP in trained mice. Therefore, it would seem reasonable to conclude that training-induced bradycardia in these small animals probably involves two mechanisms, an increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity and a decrease in intrinsic rate of pacemaker cells. In humans an increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity is a major contributor. Readers are invited to give their views on this and the accompanying CrossTalk articles in this issue by submitting a brief (250 word) comment. Comments may be submitted up to 6 weeks after publication of the article, at which point the discussion will close and the CrossTalk authors will be invited to submit a ‘Last Word’. Please email your comment to jphysiol@physoc.org. John H. Coote was Bowman Chair of Physiology at the University of Birmingham and is now Professor Emeritus. He is a specialist in Autonomic Neuroscience. He has carried out pioneering studies on cardiac innervation and renal nerves in exercise and blood volume control and made important new observations on the role of nitric oxide in spinal genital reflexes and in cardiac vagal tone in humans and in the vagal innervation of the ventricle. Formerly Editor-in-Chief of Experimental Physiology. Michael J. White is Reader in Exercise Physiology. His research has covered many aspects of human physiology including thermoregulation, muscle fatigue, disuse atrophy, the ageing process and cardiovascular and respiratory control mechanisms during exercise in health and disease. He is Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Experimental Physiology. He was elected a member of the Physiological Society 1991 and member of its Council in 2009. He is a member of the American Physiological Society and American College of Sports Medicine. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. None declared.