An increase in RV afterload consistently decreased maximum strain rate (from 1.05 to 0.73 s-1, p=0.03), whereas isovolumic strain acceleration was less sensitive to afterload changes.
Does isovolumic strain acceleration (ISA(max)) provide a more robust, load-independent index of right ventricular contractility compared to maximum strain rate (SR(max)) in an animal model?
ISA(max) is less sensitive to changes in right ventricular afterload than SR(max), suggesting it may be a more robust index of global RV contractility.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.73% vs 1.05%
p-value: p=0.03
OBJECTIVE: Doppler myocardial imaging is increasingly being used to evaluate regional and global cardiac function. Quantitative measurements of tissue deformation obtained during ejection as well as isovolumic contraction have been proposed as new indices of contractility; however, their load-sensitivity remains a matter of controversy. Maximum strain rate (SR(max)) and isovolumic strain acceleration (ISA(max)) were compared with regard to sensitivity for inotropic state, heart rate and loading conditions in the right ventricle (RV), using pressure-volume analysis as the reference method. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: RV contractility was measured at baseline, after inotropic modulation with esmolol and dobutamine, at different atrial pacing rates and during controlled alterations of RV preload and afterload. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RV contractility was assessed with the slope (Mw) of preload recruitable stroke work and longitudinal SR(max) and ISA(max). RESULTS: SR(max) and ISA(max) reflected the drug-induced changes in contractility, while only ISA(max) increased with higher pacing rates. Acute lowering of RV preload did not affect either of the indices studied. In contrast, an increase in RV afterload consistently decreased SR(max) (from 1.05 (SD 0.41) to 0.73 (SD 0.26) s(-1),p = 0.03) but had variable effects on ISA(max) and Mw. However, a significant correlation was found between proportional changes in ISA(max) and Mw during high-afterload conditions (r2 = 0.89, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Both SR(max) and ISA(max) reflected changes in RV contractility. ISA(max) was less sensitive to changes in RV afterload than SR(max) and may therefore be a more robust index of global RV contractility.
Missant et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Right ventricular contractility. Inotropic modulation, pacing, and load alterations vs. Baseline was evaluated on Maximum strain rate (SRmax) during increased RV afterload (p=0.03). An increase in RV afterload consistently decreased maximum strain rate (from 1.05 to 0.73 s-1, p=0.03), whereas isovolumic strain acceleration was less sensitive to afterload changes.