Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Several recent studies have indicated that TCP performance degrades significantly in mobile ad hoc networks. This paper examines how badly TCP may perform in such networks and provides a quantitative characterization of this performance gap. Previous approaches typically made comparisons by ignoring the inherent dynamics such as mobility, channel error and shared-channel contention. Our work provides a realistic, achievable TCP throughput upper bound, and may serve as a benchmark for future TCP modifications in ad hoc networks. Our simulation findings indicate that node mobility, especially mobility-induced network disconnection and reconnection events, has the most significant impact on TCP performance. TCP NewReno merely achieves about 10% of a reference TCPs throughput in such cases. As mobility increases, the relative throughput drop ranges from almost 0% in the static case to 1000% in a highly mobile scenario (mobility speed is 20 m/sec). In contrast, congestion and mild channel error (say, 1%) have less visible effect on TCP (with less than 10% performance drop compared with the reference TCP).
Fu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: