Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CONTEXT: Complicated grief is a debilitating disorder associated with important negative health consequences, but the results of existing treatments for it have been disappointing. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a novel approach, complicated grief treatment, with a standard psychotherapy (interpersonal psychotherapy). DESIGN: Two-cell, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, stratified by manner of death of loved one and treatment site. SETTING: A university-based psychiatric research clinic as well as a satellite clinic in a low-income African American community between April 2001 and April 2004. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 83 women and 12 men aged 18 to 85 years recruited through professional referral, self-referral, and media announcements who met criteria for complicated grief. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 46) or complicated grief treatment (n = 49); both were administered in 16 sessions during an average interval of 19 weeks per participant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Treatment response, defined either as independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Improvement score of 1 or 2 or as time to a 20-point or better improvement in the self-reported Inventory of Complicated Grief. RESULTS: Both treatments produced improvement in complicated grief symptoms. The response rate was greater for complicated grief treatment (51%) than for interpersonal psychotherapy (28%; P = .02) and time to response was faster for complicated grief treatment (P = .02). The number needed to treat was 4.3. CONCLUSION: Complicated grief treatment is an improved treatment over interpersonal psychotherapy, showing higher response rates and faster time to response.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katherine Shear
Columbia University
Ellen Frank
University of Siena
Patricia R. Houck
Helen Keller International
JAMA
University of Pittsburgh
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shear et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a094ac487ad1657d251266e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2601