Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The impact of R&D on growth through spillovers has been a major topic of economic research over the last thirty years. A central problem in the literature is that firm performance is affected by two countervailing “spillovers” : a positive effect from technology (knowledge) spillovers and a negative business stealing effects from product market rivals. We develop a general framework incorporating these two types of spillovers and implement this model using measures of a firm's position in technology space and productmarket space. Using panel data on U.S. firms, we show that technology spillovers quantitatively dominate, so that the gross social returns to R&D are at least twice as high as the private returns. We identify the causal effect of R&D spillovers by using changes in federal and state tax incentives for R&D. We also find that smaller firms generate lower social returns to R&D because they operate more in technological niches. Finally, we detail the desirable properties of an ideal spillover measure and how existing approaches, including our new Mahalanobis measure, compare to these criteria.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicholas Bloom
Hunter College
Mark Schankerman
Brookings Institution
John Van Reenen
Texas A&M Health Science Center
Econometrica
Stanford University
National Bureau of Economic Research
London School of Economics and Political Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bloom et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69da25ab0d540cafc5838976 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta9466