Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract According to the argument from self‐sacrifice, standard, unrestricted desire‐based theories of welfare fail because they have the absurd implication that self‐sacrifice is conceptually impossible. I attempt to show that, in fact, the simplest imaginable, completely unrestricted desire‐based theory of well‐being is perfectly compatible with the phenomenon of self‐sacrifice – so long as the theory takes the right form. I go on to consider a new argument from self‐sacrifice against this simple theory, which, I argue, also fails. I conclude that, contrary to popular opinion, considerations of self‐sacrifice do not pose a problem for preferentist theories of welfare.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chris Heathwood (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9091c62c2da40083afd64 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01384.x
Chris Heathwood
University of Colorado Boulder
Pacific philosophical quarterly
University of Colorado Boulder
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...