Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Personal health records (PHR) have enormous potential to improve both documentation of health information and patient care. The adoption of these systems, however, has been relatively slow. In this work, we used a multi-method approach to evaluate PHR systems. We interviewed potential end users—clinicians and patients—and conducted evaluations with patients and caregivers as well as a heuristic evaluation with HCI experts. In these studies, we focused on three PHR systems: Google Health, Microsoft HealthVault, and WorldMedCard. Our results demonstrate that both usability concerns and socio-cultural influences are barriers to PHR adoption and use. In this paper, we present those results as well as reflect on how both PHR designers and developers might address these issues now and throughout the design cycle.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0920ea1d1abd907d15fbd1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940811
Leslie S. Liu
University of California, Irvine
Patrick C. Shih
Indiana University Bloomington
Gillian R. Hayes
University of California, Riverside
Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
University of California, Irvine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: