Home-based nurse intervention reduced hospital readmissions compared to usual care (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.98; P<0.05) at 100 days post-discharge for suspected myocardial infarction.
RCT (n=324)
Single-blind
Does a home-based nurse intervention reduce hospital readmissions and improve quality of life in patients aged 65 years or over discharged after suspected myocardial infarction?
A home-based nurse intervention for older patients discharged after suspected myocardial infarction reduces early hospital readmissions and improves patient confidence.
Effect estimate: RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.5% vs 31.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
BACKGROUND: Hospital and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes do not suit many older patients and home-based rehabilitation may be more effective. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a home-based intervention for patients aged 65 years or over discharged home from hospital after emergency admission for suspected myocardial infarction. DESIGN: A single-blind randomised controlled trial comparing home-based intervention by a nurse with usual care. SUBJECTS: Patients aged 65 years or over discharged home after hospitalisation with suspected myocardial infarction (n= 324). INTERVENTION: Home-based intervention (n = 163) consisted of home visits at 1-2 and 6-8 weeks after hospital discharge by a nurse who encouraged compliance with and knowledge of their treatment regimen, offered support and guidance about resuming daily activities, and involved other community services as appropriate. MEASUREMENTS: Up to 100 days after admission, data were collected on deaths, hospital readmissions and use of outpatient services. Survivors were sent a postal questionnaire to assess activities of daily living and quality of life. RESULTS: At 100 day follow-up there was no difference in deaths, activities of daily living or overall quality of life, but those in the intervention group scored significantly better on the confidence and self-esteem subsections. The intervention group had fewer hospital readmissions (35 versus 51, relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.98, P < 0.05) and fewer days of hospitalisation after initial discharge (mean difference -1.7, 95% CI -2.09 to -1.31, P < 0.05). A total of 42/43 individuals in the intervention group had resumed driving at follow-up, compared with 32/43 in the usual care group (observed difference between proportions 23%, 95% CI 9-37%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Amongst older patients discharged home after hospitalisation for suspected myocardial infarction, home-based nurse intervention may improve confidence and self-esteem, and reduce early hospital readmissions.
Sinclair et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Suspected myocardial infarction (n=324). Home-based nurse intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Hospital readmissions at 100 days (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.98, p=<0.05). Home-based nurse intervention reduced hospital readmissions compared to usual care (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.98; P<0.05) at 100 days post-discharge for suspected myocardial infarction.