Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients was associated with lower early negative primary endpoints (3.9% vs 8.2%, P=0.004) compared to using bypass.
Cohort (n=1,020)
1,020 high-risk patients (EuroSCORE ≥6) undergoing isolated myocardial revascularization, matched by propensity score, followed for up to 5 years.
Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass vs Myocardial revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass
Early negative primary end-points — OR 2.3, p=0.004
Odds Ratio: 2.3
Absolute Event Rate: 3.9% vs 8.2%
p-value: p=0.004
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 30-day and late results in high risk patients (European score (EuroSCORE) > or = 6) who underwent isolated myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: From November 1994 to December 2001, 1266 patients with EuroSCORE > or = 6 underwent isolated myocardial revascularization. Among them, applying the propensity score, we were able to select 1020 patients operated on without CPB (group A, n=510) and with CPB (group B, n=510) with the same preoperative characteristics. The only differences were the higher incidence of patients with age between 61 and 65 years (9.4% in group A vs. 13.9% in group B, P=0.025) and the lower number of anastomoses/patient in group A (1.8+/-0.9 vs. 2.8+/-0.9, P<0.001). EuroSCORE were identical in both groups (7.8%). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was higher in group B (5.9 vs. 3.1%, P=0.035). Group A showed a lower incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) (0.6 vs. 3.1%, P=0.003), whereas incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was similar (2.0% in group A vs. 2.5% in group B, P=ns). Early negative primary end-points and early major events incidences were higher in group B (8.2 vs. 3.9%, P=0.004, and 14.5 vs. 7.1%, P<0.001, respectively). Stepwise logistic regression confirmed that CPB was an independent predictor for higher early mortality (Odds ratio (OR) 2.0) and CVA, negative primary end-points and early major events incidences (OR 4.6, 2.3 and 2.4, respectively). Five-year freedom from the events explored (death due to any cause, cardiac death, AMI, AMI on a grafted area, redo/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), redo/PTCA on a grafted area, target cardiac events (cardiac death, AMI in a grafted area and redo/PTCA in a grafted area) and any event were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In high risk patients myocardial revascularization without CPB shows better early outcome and similar clinical late results.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Antonio M. Calafiore
Interventional / Structural Cardiology
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
University of Chieti-Pescara
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Antonio M. Calafiore (Sat,) conducted a cohort in High risk patients requiring isolated myocardial revascularization (n=1,020). Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass vs. Myocardial revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass was evaluated on Early negative primary end-points (OR 2.3, p=0.004). Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients was associated with lower early negative primary endpoints (3.9% vs 8.2%, P=0.004) compared to using bypass.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fe48e9d62e9997c049a87 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00800-x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: