Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We present an analysis of in situ NO 2 measurements from aircraft experiments between summer 2004 and spring 2006. The data are from the INTEX‐A, PAVE, and INTEX‐B campaigns and constitute the most comprehensive set of tropospheric NO 2 profiles to date. Profile shapes from INTEX‐A and PAVE are found to be qualitatively similar to annual mean profiles from the GEOS‐Chem model. Using profiles from the INTEX‐B campaign, we perform error‐weighted linear regressions to compare the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) tropospheric NO 2 columns from the near‐real‐time product (NRT) and standard product (SP) with the integrated in situ columns. Results indicate that the OMI SP algorithm yields NO 2 amounts lower than the in situ columns by a factor of 0.86 (±0.2) and that NO 2 amounts from the NRT algorithm are higher than the in situ data by a factor of 1.68 (±0.6). The correlation between the satellite and in situ data is good ( r = 0.83) for both algorithms. Using averaging kernels, the influence of the algorithm's a priori profiles on the satellite retrieval is explored. Results imply that air mass factors from the a priori profiles are on average slightly larger (∼10%) than those from the measured profiles, but the differences are not significant.
Bucsela et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: