Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Effective and safe management of oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) requires a high level of patient knowledge and adherence. The aim of this study was to assess patient knowledge about OAT and factors associated with patient knowledge. METHODS: This is a baseline survey of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 22 general practices with an educational intervention for patients or their caregivers. We assessed knowledge about general information on OAT and key facts regarding nutrition, drug-interactions and other safety precautions of 345 patients at baseline. RESULTS: Participants rated their knowledge about OAT as excellent to good (56%), moderate (36%) or poor (8%). However, there was a discrepancy between self-rated knowledge and evaluated actual knowledge and we observed serious knowledge gaps. Half of the participants (49%) were unaware of dietary recommendations. The majority (80%) did not know which non-prescription analgesic is the safest and 73% indicated they would not inform pharmacists about OAT. Many participants (35-75%) would not recognize important emergency situations. After adjustment in a multivariate analysis, older age and less than 10 years education remained significantly associated with lower overall score, but not with self-rated knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Patients have relevant knowledge gaps, potentially affecting safe and effective OAT. There is a need to assess patient knowledge and for structured education programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register): DRKS00000586.Universal Trial Number (UTN U1111-1118-3464).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jean‐François Chenot
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Thanh Duc Hua
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Manar Abu Abed
SickKids Foundation
BMC Family Practice
University of Göttingen
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chenot et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21425a570f73dd9ac3ddb7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-104
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: