Fosinopril significantly reduced the risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalized angina compared to amlodipine in patients with hypertension and NIDDM (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.95).
RCT (n=380)
open-label
randomly assigned
Effect estimate: HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.26-0.95)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.4% vs 14.1%
OBJECTIVE: ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists may favorably affect serum lipids and glucose metabolism. The primary aim of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) was to compare the effects of fosinopril and amlodipine on serum lipids and diabetes control in NIDDM patients with hypertension. Prospectively defined cardiovascular events were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of NIDDM and hypertension (systolic blood pressure of > 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of > 90 mmHg). Exclusion criteria included a history of coronary heart disease or stroke, serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl, albuminuria > 40 micrograms/min, and use of lipid-lowering drugs, aspirin, or antihypertensive agents other than beta-blockers or diuretics. A total of 380 hypertensive diabetics were randomly assigned to open-label fosinopril (20 mg/day) or amlodipine (10 mg/day) and followed for up to 3.5 years. If blood pressure was not controlled, the other study drug was added. RESULTS: Both treatments were effective in lowering blood pressure. At the end of follow-up, between the two groups there was no significant difference in total serum cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, or plasma insulin. The patients receiving fosinopril had a significantly lower risk of the combined outcome of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalized angina than those receiving amlodipine (14/189 vs. 27/191; hazards ratio = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Fosinopril and amlodipine had similar effects on biochemical measures, but the patients randomized to fosinopril had a significantly lower risk of major vascular events, compared with the patients randomized to amlodipine.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Diabetes Care
Wake Forest University
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Tatti et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Hypertension and NIDDM (n=380). fosinopril vs. amlodipine was evaluated on combined outcome of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalized angina (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.95). Fosinopril significantly reduced the risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalized angina compared to amlodipine in patients with hypertension and NIDDM (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.95).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: