Significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation was independently associated with worse long-term survival (HR 1.749, p=0.047) and more heart failure related events (HR 1.641, p=0.019).
Cohort (n=239)
No
Effect estimate: HR 1.749
p-value: p=0.047
BACKGROUND: Although the presence of an RV lead is a potential cause of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the clinical impact of significant lead-induced TR is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of significant lead-induced TR on cardiac performance and long-term outcome after cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 239 ICD (n=191) or pacemaker (n=48) recipients (age 60±14 years, 77% male) from a tertiary care university hospital, with an echocardiographic evaluation before and within 1-1.5 years after device implantation were included. Significant lead-induced TR was defined as TR worsening, reaching a grade ≥2 at follow-up echocardiography. During long-term follow-up (median 58, IQR 35-76 months), all-cause mortality and heart failure related events were recorded. RESULTS: Before device implantation, most patients had TR grade 1 or 2 (64.0%) or no TR (33.9%), but after lead placement, significant TR was seen in 91 patients (38%). Changes in cardiac volumes and function at follow-up were similar between patients with and without significant lead-induced TR, except for larger RV diastolic area (17±6mm(2) vs 16±5mm(2), p=0.009), larger right atrial diameter (39±10 mm vs 36±8 mm, p<0.001) and higher pulmonary arterial pressures (41±15 mm Hg vs 33±10 mm Hg, p<0.001) in patients with significant lead-induced TR. Patients with significant lead-induced TR had worse long-term survival (HR=1.687, p=0.040) and/or more heart failure related events (HR=1.641, p=0.019). At multivariate analysis, significant lead-induced TR was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR=1.749, p=0.047) together with age, LVEF and percentage RV pacing. CONCLUSIONS: Significant lead-induced TR is associated with poor long-term prognosis.
Höke et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in ICD or pacemaker recipients (n=239). Significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation vs. No significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.749, p=0.047). Significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation was independently associated with worse long-term survival (HR 1.749, p=0.047) and more heart failure related events (HR 1.641, p=0.019).