Variable-frequency complex demodulation (VFCDM) provided better accuracy, consistency, and computational efficiency (<0.3 s on 1 min of data) than CWT and AR models for extracting breathing rates.
15 healthy subjects evaluated for respiratory rate estimation using photoplethysmogram data.
Variable-frequency complex demodulation (VFCDM) vs Continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and autoregressive (AR) models
Accuracy, consistency, and computational efficiency of extracting breathing rates
We present a new method that uses the pulse oximeter signal to estimate the respiratory rate. The method uses a recently developed time-frequency spectral estimation method, variable-frequency complex demodulation (VFCDM), to identify frequency modulation (FM) of the photoplethysmogram waveform. This FM has a measurable periodicity, which provides an estimate of the respiration period. We compared the performance of VFCDM to the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and autoregressive (AR) model approaches. The CWT method also utilizes the respiratory sinus arrhythmia effect as represented by either FM or AM to estimate respiratory rates. Both CWT and AR model methods have been previously shown to provide reasonably good estimates of breathing rates that are in the normal range (12-26 breaths/min). However, to our knowledge, breathing rates higher than 26 breaths/min and the real-time performance of these algorithms are yet to be tested. Our analysis based on 15 healthy subjects reveals that the VFCDM method provides the best results in terms of accuracy (smaller median error), consistency (smaller interquartile range of the median value), and computational efficiency (less than 0.3 s on 1 min of data using a MATLAB implementation) to extract breathing rates that varied from 12-36 breaths/min.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ki H. Chon
Electrophysiology
Shishir Dash
Sambalpur University
Kihwan Ju
Hanwha Techwin (South Korea)
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Stony Brook University
State University of New York
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chon et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Healthy subjects (n=15). Variable-frequency complex demodulation (VFCDM) vs. Continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and autoregressive (AR) models was evaluated on Accuracy, consistency, and computational efficiency of extracting breathing rates. Variable-frequency complex demodulation (VFCDM) provided better accuracy, consistency, and computational efficiency (<0.3 s on 1 min of data) than CWT and AR models for extracting breathing rates.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2223159e220ae9ef495494 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2009.2019766
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: