A model combining continuous glucose monitoring and heart rate variability predicted spontaneous hypoglycemia with a ROC AUC of 0.96 (100% sensitivity, 91% specificity), improving upon CGM alone.
Observational (n=21)
Does an algorithm combining HRV and CGM data improve the prediction of spontaneous hypoglycemia in adults with T1D?
Integrating autonomic modulation data (HRV) with CGM measurements enhances the predictive accuracy for spontaneous hypoglycemic events in patients with Type 1 Diabetes.
We have previously tested, in a laboratory setting, a novel algorithm that enables prediction of hypoglycemia. The algorithm integrates information of autonomic modulation, based on heart rate variability (HRV), and data based on a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. Now, we investigate whether the algorithm is suitable for prediction of hypoglycemia and for improvement of hypoglycemic detection during normal daily activities. Twenty-one adults (13 men) with T1D prone to hypoglycemia were recruited and monitored with CGM and a Holter device while they performed normal daily activities. We used our developed algorithm (a pattern classification method) to predict spontaneous hypoglycemia based on CGM and HRV. We compared 3 different models; (i) a model containing raw data from the CGM device; (ii) a CGM* model containing data derived from the CGM device signal; and (iii) a CGM+HRV model-combining model (ii) with HRV data. A total of 12 hypoglycemic events (glucose levels < 3.9 mmol/L, 70 mg/dL) and 237 euglycemic measurements were included. For a 20-minute prediction, model (i) resulted in a ROC AUC of 0.69. If a high sensitivity of 100% was chosen, the corresponding specificity was 69%. (ii) The CGM* model yielded a ROC AUC of 0.92 with a corresponding sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 71%. (iii) The CGM+HRV model yielded a ROC AUC of 0.96 with a corresponding sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91%. Data shows that adding information of autonomic modulation to CGM measurements enables prediction and improves the detection of hypoglycemia.
Cichosz et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Type 1 diabetes prone to hypoglycemia (n=21). CGM+HRV model vs. CGM alone models was evaluated on Prediction of spontaneous hypoglycemia at 20 minutes. A model combining continuous glucose monitoring and heart rate variability predicted spontaneous hypoglycemia with a ROC AUC of 0.96 (100% sensitivity, 91% specificity), improving upon CGM alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: