Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 120 minutes resulted in significantly worse neurologic outcomes compared to 90 minutes, invariably leading to paraplegia in survivors (p<0.0001).
RCT (n=20)
Blinded outcome assessment
Randomized
Does selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 120 minutes compared to 90 minutes worsen spinal cord ischemic injury and neurologic outcomes in a porcine model?
Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C provides insufficient spinal cord blood flow below T8/9, leading to severe ischemic injury and paraplegia when extended to 120 minutes in a porcine model.
p-value: p=<0.0001
OBJECTIVE: To shorten cooling/rewarming associated with hypothermic neuroprotection strategies during complex aortic arch surgery, selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28 degrees C has recently been advocated, although its safe limits - especially with regard to the ischaemic tolerance of the spinal cord - have not been systematically examined. METHODS: Twenty juvenile Yorkshire pigs (30.3+/-2.8kg) were randomly allocated to undergo circulatory arrest and SCP at 28 degrees C for 90 min (group A; N=12) or 120 min (group B; N=8) at 50 mmHg using alpha-stat pH management. Spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) was assessed using fluorescent microspheres at baseline (prior to SCP); at 5 and 80 min during SCP, and at 1, 5 and 48 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A modified Tarlov score was used to evaluate neurobehavioural recovery in all survivors blindly from videotapes for 5 days postoperatively. Histological ischaemic spinal cord injury was scored after sacrifice. RESULTS: All pigs could be weaned from CPB and ventilation, but seven pigs (58%) in group A and five (63%) in group B developed multi-organ failure and died within 24h. SCBF diminished immediately after initiation of SCP and was absent throughout SCP in all segments below T8/9, recovering to baseline 1h after SCP at all cord levels. All survivors suffered moderate-to-severe histological lumbar spinal cord damage, more severe in group B (p< or =0.049). Three of five group A pigs recovered normal function, but two suffered paraparesis. Group B survivors had a worse neurologic outcome (p<0.0001): all suffered paraplegia (one immediate, and two on day 2, after initial recovery). CONCLUSION: SCP provides insufficient SCBF below T8/9 to sustain cord viability. At 28 degrees C, the ischaemic tolerance of the cord may be exceeded enough by 90 min to impair function; by 120 min, SCP at 28 degrees C invariably results in paraplegia.
Etz et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Ischaemic spinal cord injury during complex aortic arch surgery (n=20). Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28°C for 120 min vs. Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at 28°C for 90 min was evaluated on Neurologic outcome (neurobehavioural recovery) (p=<0.0001). Selective cerebral perfusion at 28°C for 120 minutes resulted in significantly worse neurologic outcomes compared to 90 minutes, invariably leading to paraplegia in survivors (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: