Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Decision making often involves choosing between small, short-term rewards and large, long-term rewards. All animals, humans included, discount future rewards--the present value of delayed rewards is viewed as less than the value of immediate rewards. Despite its ubiquity, there exists considerable but unexplained variation between species in their capacity to wait for rewards--that is, to exert patience or self-control. Using two closely related primates--common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)--we uncover a variable that may explain differences in how species discount future rewards. Both species faced a self-control paradigm in which individuals chose between taking an immediate small reward and waiting a variable amount of time for a large reward. Under these conditions, marmosets waited significantly longer for food than tamarins. This difference cannot be explained by life history, social behaviour or brain size. It can, however, be explained by feeding ecology: marmosets rely on gum, a food product acquired by waiting for exudate to flow from trees, whereas tamarins feed on insects, a food product requiring impulsive action. Foraging ecology, therefore, may provide a selective pressure for the evolution of self-control.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeffrey R. Stevens
Elizabeth V. Hallinan
Michael A. Hauser
Biology Letters
Insecta mundi
Harvard University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stevens et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03ada12ef79526a5a9c47f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0285
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: