Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data andacross disciplines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sheila Hawker
Sheila Payne
Christine Kerr
Qualitative Health Research
University of Southampton
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hawker et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69da24d600ab073a27837f4b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238251
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: