Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Academic self-concept, originally posited by Shavelson as a single higher-order facet, was found by Marsh and Shavelson to comprise at least 2 higher-order academic facets (verbal and math). Marsh developed the internal/external (I/E) frame of reference model to account for the extreme separation of math and verbal self-concepts and their relations to math and verbal achievements. In our investigation, students completed the academic self-concept scales from 3 instruments that were the basis of 2 studies. In the 1st study, the 2 higher-order academic factors posited by Marsh and Shavelson fit the data substantially better than did a single higher order facet. In subsequent discussion, the Marsh/Shavelson model is more clearly defined, and directions for further research are identified. The 2nd study provided further support for the I/E frame of reference model in that (a) verbal and math self-concepts were nearly uncorrelated, (b) verbal achievement positively affected verbal self-concept but negatively affected math self-concept (i.e., higher verbal skills led to lower math self-concepts), (c) math achievement positively affected math self-concept but negatively affected verbal self-concept, and (d) the results were consistent for each of 3 self-concept instruments. Both studies demonstrate that in further research at least verbal and math self-concepts, rather than a single general facet of academic self-concepts, should be considered. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Herbert W. Marsh
University of Southern California
Barbara M. Byrne
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Richard J. Shavelson
California Institute of Technology
Journal of Educational Psychology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marsh et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1575b15347fbb1739fd143 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366