Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article discusses the conduct and evaluation of interpretive research in information systems. While the conventions for evaluating information systems case studies conducted according to the natural science model of social science are now widely accepted, this is not the case for interpretive field studies. A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. The intention of the paper is to further reflection and debate on the important subject of grounding interpretive research methodology.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Heinz K. Klein
Louisiana State University
Michael Myers
University of Auckland
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
MIS Quarterly
University of Auckland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Klein et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d949979a6164e50fa3c779 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: