Pre-operative risk scores like the ASA and Glasgow Aneurysm Score can estimate mortality risk in elderly emergency surgery patients, but none are accurate enough to replace experienced clinical judgement.
BACKGROUND: The decision on whether to operate on a sick elderly person with an intra-abdominal emergency is one of the most difficult in general surgery. A predictive risk-score would be of great value in this situation. METHODS: A Medline search was performed to identify those predictive risk-scores relevant to sick elderly patients in whom emergency surgery might be life-saving. RESULTS: Many of the risk scores for surgical patients include the operative findings or require tests which are not available in the acute situation. Most of the relevant studies include younger patients and elective surgery. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score and Hardman Index are specific to ruptured aortic aneurysm while the Boey Score and the Hacetteppe Score are specific to perforated peptic ulcer. The Reiss Index and Fitness Score can be used pre-operatively if the elements of the score can be completed in time. The ASA score, which includes a significant element of subjective clinical judgement, can be augmented with factors such as age and urgency of surgery but no test has a negative predictive value sufficient to recommend against surgical intervention without clinical input. CONCLUSION: Risk scores may be helpful in sick elderly patients needing emergency abdominal surgery but an experienced clinical opinion is still essential.
Rix et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Emergency surgery in the elderly. Pre-operative risk scores vs. Clinical judgement was evaluated on Prediction of post-operative mortality. Pre-operative risk scores like the ASA and Glasgow Aneurysm Score can estimate mortality risk in elderly emergency surgery patients, but none are accurate enough to replace experienced clinical judgement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: