Computerized linkage of birth and death registers revealed that relying on ICD cause-of-death codes alone underestimated pregnancy-related mortality by 22% in France to 93% in Massachusetts.
Observational (n=404)
Yes
OBJECTIVE: Available maternal mortality statistics do not allow valid international comparisons. Our objective was to uniformly measure underreporting of mortality from pregnancy in official statistics from selected regions within the U.S. and Europe, and to provide comparable revised profiles of pregnancy-related mortality. METHODS: We developed a standardized enhanced method to uniformly identify and classify pregnancy-associated deaths from 2 U.S. states, Massachusetts and North Carolina, and 2 European countries, Finland and France, for the years 1999-2000. Identification method included the use of all data available from the death certificate as well as computerized linkage of births and deaths registers. All cases were reviewed and classified by an international panel of experts. RESULTS: Four-hundred-and-four pregnancy-associated deaths were identified and reviewed. Underestimation of mortality causally related to pregnancy based on International Classification of Diseases cause-of-death codes alone varied from 22% in France to 93% in Massachusetts. Underreporting was greater in the regions with lower initial maternal mortality ratios. The distribution of causes of pregnancy-related mortality was specific to each region. The leading causes of death were cardiovascular conditions in Massachusetts; hemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and peripartum cardiomyopathy in North Carolina; noncardiovascular medical conditions in Finland; and hemorrhage in France. CONCLUSION: This study shows the limitations of maternal mortality statistics based on International Classification of Diseases cause-of-death codes alone. Linkage of births and deaths registers should routinely be used in the ascertainment of pregnancy-related deaths. In addition, extension of the definition of a maternal death should be considered. Beyond pregnancy-related mortality ratios, considering the specific distribution of causes-of-death is important to define prevention strategies.
Deneux‐Tharaux et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Pregnancy-related mortality (n=404). Computerized linkage of births and deaths registers vs. ICD cause-of-death codes alone was evaluated on Underestimation of pregnancy-related mortality. Computerized linkage of birth and death registers revealed that relying on ICD cause-of-death codes alone underestimated pregnancy-related mortality by 22% in France to 93% in Massachusetts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: