Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, paradigmatic debates in International Relations (IR) have focused on questions of epistemology and methodology. While important in their own right, these differences have obscured the basic divide in the discipline between substantialism, which takes entities as primitives, and relationalism, which takes processes of social transaction as the basic building blocks of theory. We argue that while both approaches can be fruitful, theories of processes and relations are better suited to address certain questions, most notably those involving change in global politics. Drawing on work in International Relations, sociology and philosophy, we examine what such theories entail and discuss areas of research for which they are especially suited.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Patrick Thaddeus Jackson
American University
Daniel H. Nexon
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
European Journal of International Relations
Columbia University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jackson et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbe4b840b636d1dda3c373 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003002
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: