Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
that a plurality of the American Catholic bishops endorse a nuclear freeze (p. 4), saying that they are thus taking their stance with Moscow,55 which for a freeze, and not with the Vatican, which is still in favor of disarmament?not a freeze.55 To make any sense at all, Mr. Lawler must mean that being for the freeze means that one not for disarmament? hardly a rational position. One recalls here the arguments, during the 19305s and 19405s, that being for racial justice in the United States was suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some, because the communists also favored it.
Cohen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.