Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A large sample of spectroscopically confirmed star-forming galaxies at redshifts 1. 4 ≤ z_ (spec) ≤ 3. 7, with imaging in the near- and mid-IR from the ground and from the Hubble Space Telescope and Space Telescope, is used to infer the average star formation histories (SFHs) of typical galaxies from z ∼ 2 7. For a subset of 302 galaxies at 1. 5 ≤ z_ (spec) 25. 5) galaxies—for _* ≳ 5 × 10⁸M_⊙ and SFRs ≳ 2M_⊙ yr^ (−1). We interpret this result in the context of several systematic biases that affect determinations of the SFR–M_* relation. The average specific SFRs at z ∼ 2–3 are remarkably similar a factor of two to those measured at z ≳ 4, implying that the average SFH is one where SFRs increase with. A consequence of these rising SFHs is that (1) a substantial fraction of UV-bright z ∼ 2–3 galaxies had faint -L* progenitors at z ≳ 4; and (2) gas masses must increase with time from z = 2 to 7, over which time the cold gas accretion rate—as inferred from the specific SFR and the Kennicutt–Schmidt relation—is ∼2–3 times than the SFR. However, if we evolve to higher redshift the SFHs and masses of the halos that are expected host L* galaxies at z ∼ 2, then we find that ≾10% of the baryons accreted onto typical halos at z ≳ 4 actually to star formation at those epochs. These results highlight the relative inefficiency of star formation even early cosmic times when galaxies were first assembling.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Naveen A. Reddy
University of California, Riverside
Max Pettini
University of Cambridge
Charles C. Steidel
California Institute of Technology
The Astrophysical Journal
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Cambridge
California Institute of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reddy et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5c8c4d25979737b88b3af — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/754/1/25
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: