Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this chapter, we review evidence from the human factors literature that verbal and visual formats can help increase the understanding of numerical risk information in health care. These visual representations of risk are grounded in empirically supported theory. As background, we first review research showing that people often have difficulty understanding numerical risks and benefits in health information. In particular, we discuss how understanding the meanings of numbers results in healthier decisions. Then, we discuss the processes that determine how communication of numerical risks can enhance (or degrade) health judgments and decisions. Specifically, we examine two different approaches to risk communication: a traditional approach and fuzzy-trace theory. Applying research on the complications of understanding and communicating risks, we then highlight how different visual representations are best suited to communicating different risk messages (i.e., their gist). In particular, we review verbal and visual messages that highlight gist representations that can better communicate health information and improve informed decision making. This discussion is informed by human factors theories and methods, which involve the study of how to maximize the interaction between humans and the tools they use. Finally, we present implications and recommendations for future research on human factors in health care.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Priscila G. Brust‐Renck
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto
Caisa Elizabeth Royer
University of Utah
Valerie F. Reyna
Cornell University
Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brust‐Renck et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19e932443d3ecd7cdf26d6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557234x13492980
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: