Natriuretic peptide-based screening reduced the incidence of LV dysfunction and major adverse cardiac events, demonstrating high cost-effectiveness in at-risk patients.
Does annual natriuretic peptide-based screening and collaborative care reduce LV dysfunction and MACE in a cost-effective manner in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
1054 participants with cardiovascular risk factors, median age 65.8 years
Annual natriuretic peptide-based screening, with collaborative cardiovascular care between specialist physicians and general practitioners provided to patients with BNP levels >50 pg/mL
Control group
Cost per case prevented and cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained; primary clinical endpoint of LV dysfunction (LVD) with or without HFcomposite
Natriuretic peptide-based screening combined with collaborative care is a cost-effective strategy that reduces the incidence of left ventricular dysfunction and major adverse cardiac events in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
Abstract Aims Prevention of cardiovascular disease and heart failure (HF) in a cost-effective manner is a public health goal. This work aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of the St Vincent’s Screening TO Prevent Heart Failure (STOP-HF) intervention. Methods and results This is a substudy of 1054 participants with cardiovascular risk factors median age 65.8 years, interquartile range (IQR) 57.8:72.4, with 4.3 years, IQR 3.4:5.2, follow-up. Annual natriuretic peptide-based screening was performed, with collaborative cardiovascular care between specialist physicians and general practitioners provided to patients with BNP levels 50 pg/mL. Analysis of cost per case prevented and cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was performed. The primary clinical endpoint of LV dysfunction (LVD) with or without HF was reduced in intervention patients odds ratio (OR) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.94; P = 0.026. There were 157 deaths and/or emergency hospitalizations for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the control group vs. 102 in the intervention group (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49–0.93; P = 0.01). The cost per case of LVD/HF prevented was €9683 (sensitivity range –€843 to €20 210), whereas the cost per MACE prevented was €3471 (sensitivity range –€302 to €7245). Cardiovascular hospitalization savings offset increased outpatient and primary care costs. The cost per QALY gain was €1104 and the intervention has an 88% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of €30 000. Conclusion Among patients with cardiovascular risk factors, natriuretic peptide-based screening and collaborative care reduced LVD, HF, and MACE, and has a high probability of being cost-effective. Trial registration NCT00921960
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mark Ledwidge
Eoin O’Connell
J. Gallagher
European Journal of Heart Failure
University College Dublin
University College Cork
St. Vincent's University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ledwidge et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Natriuretic peptide-based screening reduced the incidence of LV dysfunction and major adverse cardiac events, demonstrating high cost-effectiveness in at-risk patients.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698e30bae3d33b50e18365c7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.286