Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Our current health research enterprise is painstakingly slow and cumbersome, and its results seldom translate into practice. The slow pace of health research contributes to findings that are less relevant and potentially even obsolete. To produce more rapid, responsive, and relevant research, we propose approaches that increase relevance via greater stakeholder involvement, speed research via innovative designs, streamline review processes, and create and/or better leverage research infrastructure. Broad stakeholder input integrated throughout the research process can both increase relevance and facilitate study procedures. More flexible and rapid research designs should be considered before defaulting to the traditional two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), but even traditional RCTs can be designed for more rapid findings. Review processes for grant applications, IRB protocols, and manuscript submissions can be better streamlined to minimize delays. Research infrastructures such as rapid learning systems and other health information technologies can be leveraged to rapidly evaluate new and existing treatments, and alleviate the extensive recruitment delays common in traditional research. These and other approaches are feasible but require a culture shift among the research community to value not only methodological rigor, but also the pace and relevance of research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
William T. Riley
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Russell E. Glasgow
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Lynn Etheredge
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Clinical and Translational Medicine
Duke University
National Cancer Institute
George Washington University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Riley et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0869bb1e8b9db648de06fc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2001-1326-2-10