Does strict blood pressure control (<140 mm Hg) reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension compared to moderate control?
3260 elderly patients aged 70 to 84 years with isolated systolic hypertension (sitting blood pressure 160 to 199 mm Hg), mean age 76.1 years.
Strict blood pressure control (target <140 mm Hg)
Moderate blood pressure control (target ≥140 mm Hg to <150 mm Hg)
Composite of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular mortality and morbidity) evaluated for ≥2 yearscomposite
In elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, strict blood pressure control (<140 mm Hg) did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events compared to moderate control, though the trial was underpowered.
In this prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study, we aimed to establish whether strict blood pressure control ( or =140 mm Hg to or =2 years. The strict control (1545 patients) and moderate control (1534 patients) groups were well matched (mean age: 76.1 years; mean blood pressure: 169.5/81.5 mm Hg). Median follow-up was 3.07 years. At 3 years, blood pressure reached 136.6/74.8 mm Hg and 142.0/76.5 mm Hg, respectively. The blood pressure difference between the 2 groups was 5.4/1.7 mm Hg. The overall rate of the primary composite end point was 10.6 per 1000 patient-years in the strict control group and 12.0 per 1000 patient-years in the moderate control group (hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.34; P=0.38). In summary, blood pressure targets of or = 70 years of age with isolated systolic hypertension, although our trial was underpowered to definitively determine whether strict control was superior to less stringent blood pressure targets.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Toshio Ogihara
Nihon University
Takao Saruta
Northwestern University
Hiromi Rakugi
Preventive Cardiology
Hypertension
Sapporo Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ogihara et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56df075589c71d767d1ef — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.146035