Does cryoablation reduce the risk of esophageal ulceration compared to radiofrequency ablation in a preclinical calf model?
In a preclinical calf model, cryoablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of esophageal ulceration compared to radiofrequency ablation, suggesting a potentially lower risk of atrio-esophageal fistula formation.
BACKGROUND: Atrio-esophageal fistulas have been described as a consequence of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether cryoablation can avoid this potential fatal complication remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the effects of direct application of RF and cryoablation on the cervical esophagus in 16 calves. Cryoablation was performed with a 6.5-mm catheter probe using a single 5-minute freeze at 0.05). However, lesion width and volume were significantly larger with RF than with cryoablation at Day 7. Although acute (Day 1) and chronic (Day 14) RF and cryoablation lesions were of comparable size, histologic evidence of partial- to full-wall esophageal lesion ulceration was observed in 0 of 44 (0%) lesions with cryoablation, compared with 9 of 41 (22%) lesions with RF ablation (P = 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: Direct application of cryoablation and RF ablation created similar acute and chronic lesion dimensions on the esophagus. However, cryoablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of esophageal ulceration, compared with RF ablation.
Ripley et al. (Wed,) studied this question.