Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter- and intrarater reliability of using a new scale (Welling scale) for resident evaluation of temporal bone dissection performance. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial. METHODS: Twelve residents in otolaryngology (postgraduate year PGY 2-5) drilled 26 temporal bones (21 cadaveric, 5 plastic) with the objective to perform a complete mastoidectomy with facial recess approach. These bones were then rated using the Welling scale by six independent raters on two separate occasions (4-6 wk apart). Raters were blinded to PGY year. The Kappa statistic was calculated for inter- and intrarater reliability. RESULTS: Intrarater agreement was high for all raters, ranging from kappa = 0.65 to 0.72 (all P < .001), whereas the interrater agreement scores were more moderate (range, kappa = 0.49-0.64; all P < .01). CONCLUSION: The Welling scale can be used reliably to assess temporal bone dissection performance where performance is measured by assessment of end product (mastoidectomy with facial recess approach).
Butler et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: