Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this essay, we review research from the social sciences on how the public makes sense of and participates in societal decisions about science and technology. We specifically highlight the role of the media and public communication in this process, challenging the still dominant assumption that science literacy is both the problem and the solution to societal conflicts. After reviewing the cases of evolution, climate change, food biotechnology, and nanotechnology, we offer a set of detailed recommendations for improved public engagement efforts on the part of scientists and their organizations. We emphasize the need for science communication initiatives that are guided by careful formative research; that span a diversity of media platforms and audiences; and that facilitate conversations with the public that recognize, respect, and incorporate differences in knowledge, values, perspectives, and goals.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew C. Nisbet
Dietram A. Scheufele
American Journal of Botany
University of Wisconsin–Madison
American University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nisbet et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d84e9c5c3030ff03d19d8f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: