Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Those interested in the construction of security in contemporary international politics have increasingly turned to the conceptual framework of `securitization'. This article argues that while an important and innovative contribution, the securitization framework is problematically narrow in three senses. First, the form of act constructing security is defined narrowly, with the focus on the speech of dominant actors. Second, the context of the act is defined narrowly, with the focus only on the moment of intervention. Finally, the framework of securitization is narrow in the sense that the nature of the act is defined solely in terms of the designation of threats. In outlining this critique, the article points to possibilities for developing the framework further as well as for the need for those applying it to recognize both limits of their claims and the normative implications of their analysis. I conclude by pointing to how the framework might fit within a research agenda concerned with the broader construction of security.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matt McDonald
European Journal of International Relations
University of Warwick
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matt McDonald (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd0928a6f240e91f133652 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097553