Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The New Chaucer Society presented a panel at their international meeting this last July on gender and historicism. As an audience participant, I was struck by the fact that despite the twenty-year flourishing existence of the Society for Medieval Feminist Scholarship, with one exception, neither it nor the word "feminism" were mentioned by the panel or in the discussion that followed. Furthermore, a number of panelists expressed their discomfort with identifying themselves with women's studies despite their personal dedication to feminism, a discomfort I, despite my own commitment to feminist historicist study, to some extent share. While dismayed by the potential of the so-called postfeminist age to eclipse the study of women altogether, I, at the same time, do not wish to rehash arguments and positions that feminists have painfully and productively deconstructed through feminist theory's various phases. Feminist medievalists working in medieval English studies have reached an impasse that I hope we can overcome: how can we bring feminist questions into the center of critical inquiry without seeming to be harping on old news?
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elizabeth Robertson (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ad2b96f9280a32b5d00a4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tsw.2007.a220824
Elizabeth Robertson
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...