Microalbuminuria screening starting at age 50 is cost-effective at 2-year intervals for diabetes (ICER 54,000 CHF/QALY), 5-year for hypertension (33,000 CHF/QALY), and 10-year for others.
Is microalbuminuria screening cost-effective in subjects aged ≥50 years with or without diabetes and hypertension?
Microalbuminuria screening is cost-effective starting at age 50, with optimal intervals of 2 years for diabetics, 5 years for hypertensives, and 10 years for the general population.
PRINCIPLES: Current evidence indicates that chronic kidney disease (CKD) can be detected by simple laboratory tests. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of microalbuminuria screening and subsequent treatment in different populations. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of microalbuminuria screening in a cohort of simulated subjects aged ≥50 years was assessed using a validated microsimulation model. Microalbuminuria screening was simulated for 1-, 2-, 5- or 10-year intervals and for 3 groups: diabetes (DM), hypertension but no diabetes (HTN), and no diabetes or hypertension. Positive microalbuminuria screening was followed by treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). The model outcomes evaluate costs from a health care system perspective. RESULTS: Screening of risk groups is cost-effective at a 2-year interval for the DM group with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 54,000 CHF/ Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) and at a 5-year interval for the HTN group with an ICER of 33,000 CHF/QALY. Screening of the remaining population is cost-effective at a 10-year interval with an ICER of 34,000 CHF/QALY. The ICER improves with longer screening intervals for all groups. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) confirmed 2-year, 5-year and 10-year intervals as the most cost-effective for the DM group, the HTN group and the remaining population respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Microalbuminuria screening can be considered cost-effective starting at the age of 50 years at bi-annual intervals for subjects with diabetes, at 5-year intervals for subjects with hypertension and at 10-year intervals for the remaining population. Our results indicate that early detection and treatment of CKD might lead to optimised patient care, and offer guidance for future implementation of CKD screening programmes.
Kessler et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Chronic kidney disease. Microalbuminuria screening vs. Different screening intervals (1-, 2-, 5- or 10-year) was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in CHF/QALY. Microalbuminuria screening starting at age 50 is cost-effective at 2-year intervals for diabetes (ICER 54,000 CHF/QALY), 5-year for hypertension (33,000 CHF/QALY), and 10-year for others.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: