Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: To compare the agility demands of 4 small-sided games (SSGs) and evaluate the variability in demands for elite Australian Football (AF). METHODS: Fourteen male elite Australian Football League (AFL) players (mean ± SD; 21.7 ± 3.1 y, 189.6 ± 9.0 cm, 88.7 ± 10.0 kg, 39.4 ± 57.1 games) completed 4 SSGs of 3 × 45-s bouts each with modified designs. Video notational analysis, GPS at 5 Hz, and triaxial accelerometer data expressed the external player loads within games. Three comparisons were made using a paired t test (P .05, ES = 0.16) in agility events compared with normal AFL tackling rules (SSG 2, 8.3 ± 3.6; SSG 4, 7.8 ± 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: SSG characteristics can influence agility-training demand, which can vary considerably for individuals. Coaches should carefully consider SSG design to maximize the potential to develop agility for all players.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael J. Davies
Gwynedd Council
Warren Young
Federation University
Damian Farrow
Edith Cowan University
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Federation University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Davies et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21296df69db56553c3c04b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.8.2.139