Existing research suggests that candidate viability influences strategic voting decisions among citizens. We argue that viability can influence electoral decision making beyond strategic considerations. We analyze original experimental data and novel observational data to examine viability’s impact on vote choice and information seeking. We conduct two mock primary election campaigns within the Dynamic Process Tracing Environment where we experimentally manipulate candidate viability. In both experiments, we find that subjects read more information about viable candidates, report more favorable ratings of viable candidates, and are more likely to vote for viable candidates. We demonstrate the generalizability of these results by assessing the relationship between viability, as measured with Gallup polls, and information seeking using observational data. There, we develop a unique measure of information seeking based on Google searches for the names of political candidates. These observational data reinforce the relationship between viability and information seeking.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stephen Utych
Boise State University
Cindy D. Kam
Vanderbilt University
The Journal of Politics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Utych et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11e3dd0db2e61b4b8e0e51 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613001126
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: