Feature selection techniques applied to state-of-the-art ECG classification models achieved better performances by removing useless features compared to previously reported feature choices.
Heart beat classification
Feature selection techniques vs Previously reported feature choices
Classification performance
Supervised and interpatient classification of heart beats is primordial in many applications requiring long-term monitoring of the cardiac function. Several classification models able to cope with the strong class unbalance and a large variety of feature sets have been proposed for this task. In practice, over 200 features are often considered, and the features retained in the final model are either chosen using domain knowledge or an exhaustive search in the feature sets without evaluating the relevance of each individual feature included in the classifier. As a consequence, the results obtained by these models can be suboptimal and difficult to interpret. In this work, feature selection techniques are considered to extract optimal feature subsets for state-of-the-art ECG classification models. The performances are evaluated on real ambulatory recordings and compared to previously reported feature choices using the same models. Results indicate that a small number of individual features actually serve the classification and that better performances can be achieved by removing useless features.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gauthier Doquire
UCLouvain
Gaël de Lannoy
GlaxoSmithKline (Switzerland)
D. François
Université d'Artois
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
KU Leuven
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Doquire et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Heart beat classification. Feature selection techniques vs. Previously reported feature choices was evaluated on Classification performance. Feature selection techniques applied to state-of-the-art ECG classification models achieved better performances by removing useless features compared to previously reported feature choices.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207f08ca5c5b2ddfa5e265 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/643816